AI Tools: The Ultimate Action Amplifier

How We've Shifted from Knowledge Competition to Action Competition

We've officially left the era of competing on who knows more. Today, if you know how to leverage any AI tool effectively, you'll find they offer faster knowledge acquisition than traditional search engines, with real-time tracking of trending topics. We've transitioned from "when in doubt, Google it" to "when in doubt, ask AI" in just a few months.

While being knowledgeable remains an advantage, it's no longer irreplaceable. Learning a programming skill used to take months or even years, but with modern IDEs and AI coding assistants, the learning curve has dramatically shortened. More remarkably, if you're "lazy" enough, you don't even need to learn deeply—you can jump straight into action and rapidly validate your ideas, because AI-generated demos provide sufficient insight into your concepts' viability.

The Growing Gap Between Doers and Thinkers

Here's the critical point I want to emphasize: AI tools, while enabling action, are simultaneously amplifying the gap between those who act and those who merely think. Eventually, you'll discover that taking action is 10^100 times more important than accumulating knowledge.

In the pre-AI era, what prevented us from acting was the need to invest massive amounts of time learning skills. Laziness, of course, played a role too.

But now, with powerful tools at our fingertips, we can instantly consult AI when we have ideas, and if they seem promising, we immediately dive in. Sometimes we even create problems out of thin air just to "squeeze" more value from AI. This confidence in our abilities—or more accurately, this trust in AI's capabilities—has propelled us to the peak of actionability.

From Git Learning Struggles to AI-Powered Breakthroughs

Over the past year, I've frequently worked with Git and encountered numerous bizarre issues as a beginner. I used to spend hours searching online for solutions, often ending up empty-handed. This not only made me fear Git but, more fundamentally, caused me to stagnate whenever I hit a roadblock.

Since discovering powerful AI tools, encountering problems no longer causes panic. Instead, it sparks a desire to test AI's capability boundaries. Solving mysterious issues has become much simpler—success basically depends on how fast you can copy and paste. Without the fear of difficulty, doing things has transformed from a chore into both an enjoyment and a hobby.

When Knowledge Becomes Cheap, Action Becomes Precious

Conversely, when most people choose action to rapidly validate their ideas, those who choose inaction find themselves at a significant disadvantage. This disadvantage isn't caused by capability gaps but by laziness.

When knowledge becomes exceptionally easy to acquire (becomes cheap), action becomes exceptionally valuable.

Knowledge and skills are, in my view, two distinct concepts that are often seen as an interconnected whole. In the era when knowledge could only be acquired through memorization, gaining skills was extremely difficult—like trying to observe surgery without understanding human anatomy. You might eventually learn to mimic the process, but you'd remain merely a mechanical tool.

As AI tools rapidly evolve, "knowledge outsourcing" is gradually shifting toward "skill outsourcing." This means not only will knowledge become increasingly democratized, but skills requiring extensive deliberate practice will follow suit.

I'm not suggesting knowledge and skills are useless—deep domain expertise and high-end skills remain the most valuable assets. However, no matter how much you know, without action, it remains worthless. This exemplifies what Li Xiaolai calls "pseudo-learning"—people who read extensively and understand many principles yet still can't live fulfilling lives.

My Year of Supercharged Action

This year, my action-taking ability has been extraordinary, which is easy to understand—I've never been lazy (at least regarding learning). I once wrote 1,000-word public articles daily for two consecutive months. My previous lack of output wasn't due to unwillingness but complete incapability.

This year, using AI tools, I've created numerous projects: from static blogs to interactive websites, iOS applications, and an e-book I just completed. While these projects may have limited value, their impact on shaping my "action-taking ability" has been invaluable.

I have a friend who's been talking about making short videos for months with no progress. He constantly shares his ideas with me but never acts. When I suggested he start by posting 100 "garbage" videos for practice, he claimed he couldn't find suitable material.

I operate differently. When I have an idea, I find ways to implement it. Even if I can't fully execute it, I push myself forward incrementally. As I posted on social media: "Because I browse social media, I must post on social media."

Having no audience isn't a big deal—it's harmless.

Next insigths come frome Claude

The Paradigm Shift: From Capability Anxiety to Action Anxiety

We're witnessing a fundamental transformation in how we approach uncertainty. Previously, we worried about "What if I don't know how?" Now, we should worry about "What if I don't do anything?" This shift from capability anxiety to action anxiety marks a fundamental change in societal competition dynamics.

The Trial-and-Error Cost Revolution

AI tools' greatest value isn't providing standard answers—it's reducing trial-and-error costs to nearly zero. This makes "failing fast" genuinely possible, and rapid failure is the core mechanism of innovation. When the cost of experimentation plummets, the barrier to entry for innovation disappears.

The Action Dividend Era

We're in a unique historical window—AI tools are powerful enough, but most people haven't yet developed "think-it-do-it" action habits. This resembles the early internet era when early adopters gained significant advantages. Today, those who first embrace AI-powered mass action will capture the "action dividend."

From Deep Specialization to Broad Implementation

The traditional "10,000-hour rule" may need redefinition. With AI assistance, perhaps "1,000 hours of practice + AI collaboration" provides more value than "10,000 hours of pure human practice," because the former enables actual output across broader domains.

The friend I mentioned who "can't find material" represents a psychological trap many face. This reflects a deeper issue: people are still applying "industrial-era quality standards" to themselves, not realizing that in the AI era, "quantity first, rapid iteration" might be the superior strategy.

The New Survival Strategy

In essence, we're describing a new survival strategy for the AI age: becoming a "high-frequency actor" offers more advantages than becoming a "deep thinker."

This doesn't diminish the value of deep thinking—it simply recognizes that in an era where AI can handle much of the cognitive heavy lifting, the bottleneck has shifted to execution. The competitive advantage now lies not in what you can think of, but in what you can ship.

The future belongs to those who can rapidly translate ideas into reality, iterate quickly based on feedback, and maintain a bias toward action over analysis paralysis. In this new paradigm, your willingness to act—imperfectly but consistently—becomes your most valuable asset.

As AI continues to democratize knowledge and lower skill barriers, the question isn't whether you're smart enough or skilled enough—it's whether you're brave enough to start before you feel ready. Because in the AI age, ready is a luxury we can no longer afford to wait for.